How to Set Traps in a Presentation

In one of my earlier posts I talked about one reason why you should consider presenting first in a sales cycle: so that you can set traps for your competition. Setting traps is a delicate topic for most Sales Engineers: you can lose credibility quickly by slinging mud at the competition. But setting traps well can make all the difference in a competitive sales cycle.

The key to effectively setting traps is truly understanding the needs of your prospect combined with knowing the weaknesses of your competition. While it may be true that your competition has difficult to configure software your prospect may not care about this characteristic and setting a trap won’t be worth the effort.

The steps to setting an effective trap in a presentation are:

  1. Understand the specific needs of your prospect and areas where your product can clearly meet those needs
  2. Compare these strengths with the known weaknesses of your competition (using whatever competitive intelligence you might have)
  3. Bring these differences to light in a presentation (or demo) AFTER you have firmly established credibility
  4. Make a clear statement of comparison to your competition, such as, “Ask the other vendors whether they have this capability”
  5. Discuss the traps “during the break” with the prospect to ensure you hit the mark

Establishing credibility first is critical to success in setting traps. For a trap to be effective the prospect must challenge your competition directly in their presentation. If you don’t have credibility, and the trust that goes with it, the prospect won’t take action on your suggestions. It is because of this credibility that Sales Engineers are in a unique position to set traps during a presentation or demonstration.

Traps don’t have to be about product features or functions: they can be about anything you feel is weak in your competition AND matters to your prospect. You can set traps about company stability, overall product quality, ability to deliver or even demonstration style. When I was working at PeopleSoft one of our competitors, Lawson Software, set an extremely effective trap against us multiple times. They set the perception in the prospect’s mind that PeopleSoft was just a “tool” for creating applications and that Lawson, by comparison, was a fully-bake solution. Specifically they suggested that audience members should write down how many times the word “toolset” or “tool” was used during a PeopleSoft demonstration as a measure of the truth of that statement. Unfortunately we used those terms all the time to describe the flexibility of our product. It was only when we saw an audience member putting tic marks on their notes (and asked what they were doing) that we discovered the trap that had been set.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit

Dave Sohigian - TechDemoGuy Demo Skills, Selling , , , ,

  1. July 8th, 2009 at 22:41 | #1

    Just a caution – if you are planning to tell a prospect to ask a competitor about capabilities, be absolutely sure you have up-to-date information about the competing products. I have nailed many sales by showing prospects capabilities that competitors claimed we didn't have. What's more, those competitors lost a heap of credibility.

    • July 8th, 2009 at 23:05 | #2

      @metabrown – Great point. I have done the same. Getting good intelligence on competitors is difficult and you have to update it as often as possible. If you are unsure you can soften the challenge and make it less direct on your competitor (then at least it will just be a \”me too\” for them).

      BTW, my wife's name is Meta. It's an unusual name and I don't see it often. She pronounces it \”Maita\”, how about you?

      • May 18th, 2010 at 17:13 | #3

        Dave,

        I'm just now seeing that you asked me a question – 44 weeks later, LOL.

        Yes, I pronounce the name with a long "a" sound, too. It's from my German-speaking Swiss family. Several relatives have the same name, and of course they pronounce it the same way, but better.

        Meta

        • May 20th, 2010 at 21:06 | #4

          Meta,

          That's cool. My wife does not know any other Meta's – interesting that that you know several in your family. Although she does have some German roots it is not at all clear where the name came from in her case. I think her parents just liked it. Her siblings have fairly ordinary American names.

          Happy selling!

          Dave Sohigian
          Generational Research:http://www.thegenxfiles.com
          />SE Blog:http://www.techdemoguy.com
          /> c. 503-841-7130

  1. No trackbacks yet.